Date: February 15, 2001
To: AAF Members
From: Clark Rector, Jr., Vice President-State Government Affairs
Re: Maryland Legislation - Commercialism in Schools
Legislation has been introduced in the Maryland Senate that would severely curtail the ability of local school districts to contract with commercial entities to provide services and goods to local schools. The bill seems to be based on a misguided notion that students are a "captive audience" being bombarded by "pervasive advertising in school."
Senate Bill 435 would eliminate much of the discretion that Maryland school boards have to contract with commercial entities, both local and national. Some specific provisions of the bill would prohibit
The advertising industry is not suggesting that any of the practices that
would be banned by the legislation should be required, but local officials are fully
capable of determining what level of commercial involvement is appropriate for
their schools.
A blanket ban on the use of brand names would eliminate a teacher's ability to
incorporate real world examples into lessons plans, since those examples would
not be "necessary to the instruction." A literal reading of the language would
eliminate photographs that included brand logos (as for example on phone booths,
automobiles or retail establishments).
Advertising and other commercial involvement should not be exploitative or
children. Local officials should be free to work with their commercial partners to
determine the appropriate level of participation.
An appropriate level of commercial involvement can be a much-needed source of
revenue for many cash-strapped schools. This legislation would virtually eliminate
that option for schools.
The legislation is sponsored by Senators Pinsky, Blount, Conway, Dyson, Frosh,
Harris, Hollinger, Kelley, Sfikas and Van Hollen. We urge you to contact Maryland
lawmakers and ask them to oppose Senate Bill 435.